The bible vs the medical system: part 7 modern pharmakeia

You’ve been hit by a smooth criminal!

Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy [2016]

Drug-related celebrity deaths: A cross-sectional study

According to this research study, 220 celebrities died of drug-related deaths between 1970 – 2015!

[Another source puts that number at over 400.  A third source says it’s 200+, so we have validation here].

If you filter out alcohol and illegal drugs, there were 135 – 140 celebrity deaths just from prescription drugs alone.

How do you put a price on the cost to them, their families and the effect on society?

His death was declared a homicide due to the combination of benzodiazepines and propofol found in his body.

The government website pub chem says, “Benzodiazepine is a group of two-ring heterocyclic compounds consisting of a benzene ring fused to a diazepine ring.”

Benzodiazepines are a class of drugs known as minor tranquilizers and anticonvulsants and contain 50% benzene, a petrochemical and an ingredient in crude oil, detergents, dyes, explosives, lubricants, pesticides and rubbers.

Just what we all want to bath our brain cells in!

Some of the more common exposures of benzene are tobacco smoke, motor vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions.

Benzene is also a known human carcinogen, which is why its content in gasoline is not allowed to be more than 1%.  However, the EPA put in place new regulations in 2011 that limited the maximum benzene content of gasoline to only 0.62%, further emphasizing its toxicity.

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [ATSDR] lists benzene as number 6.

Notice that benzene and benzene containing compounds are listed 3 times in the top 10, more than any other substance.

Furthermore, biphenyls [polychlorinated] are #5 on the list and are derivatives of benzene, so benzene is really involved in 40% of the top 10.

One glaring example of biphenyls is BPA, which is in many plastic drinking bottles, thermal paper receipts and it also lines many canned foods.

It’s categorized as an endocrine disrupter that has already been banned by Canada and the European Union, but is still in use in the United States, although its use has been declining.

How can it be legal to put benzene in any substance designed for human consumption?!?!

The FDA, who is supposed to regulate the pharmaceutical industry, is fully aware of this information, yet they still allow it to go on, so they have to be part of the problem.

Therefore, there must be foul play going on, such as bribery, coercion or a conflict of interest.

Many times, a CEO of a large company will quit their job and be hired by the department of the FDA that oversees the industry that the CEO was just employed by!

That same CEO often owns large amounts of stock in the company that he formerly controlled.

In other words, there is a selfish conflict of interest going on.

As a matter of fact, there has been over 800 documented waivers of conflict of interest in the government already.

This is the level of corruption we are dealing with in the drug industry and it’s all based on the love of money.

I Timothy 6
9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.
10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
11 But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.

Notice the fire and skull & cross bones symbols on the left side of the bottle!  This tells us it’s highly flammable and very toxic.

But it gets even worse.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] has set a Maximum Contaminate Level [MCL] for benzene in drinking water at only 0.005 mg/L [5 ppb], as promulgated via the U.S. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.

This regulation is based on preventing benzene leukemogenesis [that which causes leukemia = “any of several cancers of the bone marrow that prevent the normal manufacture of red and white blood cells and platelets, resulting in anemia, increased susceptibility to infection, and impaired blood clotting”.

Leviticus 17:11
For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.

Look where the adversary [Satan – the indirect onslaught of the devil] attacks us through the medical system: the very “heart” of the flesh = the blood.

If the blood can be contaminated or weakened in any way, it will have the same effect on the entire body.

The American Petroleum Institute (API) stated in 1948 that “it is generally considered that the only absolutely safe concentration for benzene is zero”.  There is no safe exposure level; even tiny amounts can cause harm.

The maximum contaminant level goal [MCLG], a nonenforceable health goal that would allow an adequate margin of safety for the prevention of adverse effects, is zero benzene concentration in drinking water.

Now we know why.

DO THE MATH!

Since the maximum contamination level was set to be only 5 parts per billion [0.005 mg/L in drinking water], that tells us how incredibly toxic benzene really is.

According to drugs.com, depending on the disorder treated, klonopin, one of the many forms of benzodiazipines [benzos for short], the maximum recommended daily dose is 20 mg.

However, the recommended daily dosage is often only 1 – 5 mg, depending on variables.

So let’s conservatively say that a person only takes one 4 mg klonopin pill per day.

Some other benzodiazepine anticonvulsants are valium, onfi, atavan, transxene T-tab and versed.

How many millions of people have been poisoned by these toxic drugs?

The federal Controlled Substances Act [CSA] of 1970 by the DEA [Drug Enforcement Agency, a branch of the US government] classifies drugs into five schedules [categories] based on the potential for abuse and whether or not the drug has been proven and accepted for medical use.

Each schedule is governed by different rules regarding drug production, sale, possession, and use, and, depending on the schedule, the punishment for a violation may be more severe.

The schedules range from 1 to 5, with 1 being the most severe and 5 being the least.

Schedule I drugs have a high potential for abuse, as well as a high potential for severe dependence. Since there’s no currently accepted medical use for these drugs, all possession or use is illegal.

Some examples of schedule 1 drugs are cannabis [this classification is very controversial and some states have bypassed federal regulations], ecstasy, heroin, and psychedelics [certain kinds of mushrooms, DMT and LSD].

Schedule 5 drugs are have a low potential for abuse and a low or limited potential for dependence. These drugs have currently accepted medical uses, and it’s possible to obtain a legal prescription for them. Examples include codeine-infused cough syrups, ezogabine, and others.

Benzodiazepines are classified as schedule 4 drugs.

Is that a coincidence or by design that such destructive chemicals also can be potentially addictive?

Criminal intent?

Since the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies already know in advance the damage that benzos cause, yet they also deliberately manufacture, approve, regulate and sell them, isn’t this, in reality, criminal intent?

Since I’m not an attorney, I don’t know, but it makes you really wonder about the ethics of all this.

From blackslawdictionary.org:

“Criminal intent is a necessary component of a “conventional” crime and involves a conscious decision on the part of one party to injure or deprive another.

It is one of three categories of “mens rea,” the basis for the establishment of guilt in a criminal case. There are multiple shades of criminal intent that may be applied in situations ranging from outright premeditation to spontaneous action”.

Obviously, writing prescriptions for such drugs as klonopin or valium are not legal crimes, but based upon:

• a deliberate decision to administer a drug with known toxic consequences
• proven potential for addiction or abuse

shouldn’t they be?

And shouldn’t the entities who manufacture, regulate, sell and administer such substances be held accountable?

Just food for thought.

And this is just one drug out of thousands.

Not to mention the countless and untested interactions of all these drugs with each other.

Then add in all the other untested variables, such as how do drugs A, B, C and D interact with each other when in the presence of:

• mercury [from dental fillings]
• glyphosate [a toxic ingredient in roundup, an herbicide that has found its way into nearly every plant, animal, water source, soil, and air]
• chlorine and its byproducts from drinking water, swimming pools and taking a shower
• chem trails from planes
• car exhaust
• out-gassing of VOC’s [Volatile Organic Compounds] from the vinyl flooring you just had installed in your kitchen

The number of combinations drugs with other drugs and the 80,000 different environmental chemicals probably cannot even be calculated.

This is what is known as the systematization of error, where one area of error affects another, which affects another, etc.

Drug classifications, their function and the violation of biblical principles

There are many different ways to classify drugs.  Just some examples are:

• Legal status: legal or illegal
• Risk status: safe or dangerous
• Name: Generic or brand name
• Disease [s]:  what diseases are they designed to treat
• Pharmacodynamics: mechanisms of action within the body
• Source: plants or synthetic
• Formulary:  according to Blue cross/blue shield, medications are assigned to one of four, five or six categories known as copayment or coinsurance tiers, based on drug usage, cost and clinical effectiveness.

I am in the process of classifying drugs from a biblical and spiritual perspective.

Here is what I discovered so far from a quick study guide on pharmacology and my own observations:

• Poisons: some drugs, such as benzos, literally poison the body with a known highly toxic substance, such as benzene, that has zero nutritional value, in order to achieve the desired effect.   Therefore, this cannot be a true or Godly form of medicine, but is in fact, an attack against God’s second greatest work, the human body, disguised as medicine.
  • Romans 1:30
    Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
  • Who invented the idea that a highly toxic poison should be put in a prescription medication?  In my opinion, it would have to be inspired by devil spirits, not the one true God.
• Counterfeit:  other prescription drugs, such as thyroxine, are a synthetic counterfeit of a substance that the human body produces naturally.  In this case, thyroxine is a counterfeit of the thyroid hormone.  It is chemically different enough that it can be declared a unique substance, and therefore be patentable so that the drug manufacturers can make lots of money off of it, yet is similar enough to the original thyroid hormone to achieve an effect approaching the original.   That’s a tough chemical balancing act.
  • The bible is full of verses about how the devil counterfeits virtually everything that God says or does.  Thus, if a drug counterfeits a substance in the body in order to achieve an effect, who really inspired it?
• Inhibitors: many classes of drugs are deliberately designed to disrupt necessary bodily functions.  One example are the PPI’s [Proton Pump Inhibitors], which greatly reduce the acid produced by the stomach.   This can cause multiple mineral deficiencies because they require stomach acid to be properly digested.  The late Dr. Linus Pauling, who won 2 nobel prizes, discovered that nearly every disease can be traced back to a mineral deficiency.   This may not be the only cause, but is certainly one of them.
  • How is it possible for the human body to be healed if a drug is deliberately disrupting a necessary function within it?  It can’t.  In the long run, it degrades the overall functioning of the body and makes it sicker, which will usually prompt another doctor visit, which almost always will result in yet another medication, which will probably have the same net effect.  This pattern is often repeated until the patient dies a premature death, just like the hundreds of celebrities and millions of people around the world harmed and killed by prescription drugs.

Risk vs benefit

This goes back to the Hippocratic oath: first do no harm.  Yet the definition of risk means “exposure to the chance of injury or loss”, so once again the Hippocratic oath is being violated.

Taking a high-risk drug for a minor ailment does not make sense.

However, a person who has a very serious illness may be willing to accept a higher risk if it will get the illness under control.

With many drugs, the situation has gotten out of hand.

My mother-in-law [she died in 2020] who was in a hospital with an afib condition.  Atrial fibrillation (also called AFib or AF) is a quivering or irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia) that can lead to blood clots, stroke, heart failure and other heart-related complications.

One of the medicines for it that the hospital wanted to give her actually has a 20% death rate as a side effect!

You would literally be safer playing Russian roulette with an old fashioned six shooter [17% chance of dying] than taking the medicine for the heart condition [20% chance of dying].

How did such a drug even get approved?

Wasn’t it tested enough?

In some emergencies, you have to take whatever medicines will achieve the desired effect in the shortest amount of time in order to save a person’s life or to prevent too much damage.

For that we should be thankful.

But for most chronic or degenerative diseases, improving our diet, exercise, lifestyle, supplements, etc is a much safer and more effective solution that can bring about great relief and in some cases, actually reverse the illness.